In high
school, my brother and cousin would sometimes fake argue in French. They’d get
into very heated yelling matches, but what most people never realized was a lot
of the words they were saying, when translated back to English, were fairly
basic random and not mean or aggressive at all. One of their favorite words to
yell at each other was pomplamoose, which in English is grape fruit. When you
angrily yell pomplamoose at someone, it sounds a lot worse than what it truly
means. They fooled a lot of people with this little game, until someone who
actually spoke French outted them for faking their argument.
This past
week an article has been circulating among a handful of my music industry
friends about how much a band made/didn’t make on a recent tour. Over the
course of the past 3 days this article has taken some interesting turns, so I
thought I would walk you through each day since I first read the article and
throw in my two cents as we go.
Day 1 – A
friend posted the article with the tag line “All independent artists need to
read this” which honestly is a tag line that regularly prompts me to read the
article. There’s a lot of good and bad advice out there for artists and so I do
my best to stay informed with what people are saying, both good and bad. I
don’t deny that it’s hard for bands to turn a profit when they’re first
starting out. Touring is expensive and after my first read I remember thinking
there was some key things being mentioned in the article that a lot of bands
might not consider when planning a tour, but at the same time I also had a
nagging sense that some points were also missed that countered the arguments.
One of the biggest one being like any business starting out, you’re going to
have expenses and most business starting out don’t turn a profit in the first
year or two…if they ever get to the point of turning a profit. This is no
different for any artist. If you want to be a professional musician, you’re
starting a business and you’re going to have expenses. If a local business decides
to branch out and open new locations in new markets, chances when they first
enter the market they will lose money. The same happens to artists performing
in new markets for the first time. When I finally finished the article I
remember thinking “I’d be curious to see if the band would lose money again if
they ventures out and did the exact same tour again in a couple months”…in
theory, if they put on good shows and engaged their audiences the first time
around, there’s a good chance the second time around the audience would return
and bring friends with them.
Day 2 –
Criticism begins…the next day I started seeing other industry friends
commenting on the article. Some jumping on the band wagon of “Yeah, us artist
get screwed all the time” but also some industry professionals, in other words
people actually working full time in the music industry, questioning some of
the ‘facts’ laid out in the article, questioning the cost of some of the
expenses and suggesting alternative cheaper ways to tour as a band. I re-read
the article and some of my earlier questions about some of the ‘facts’ started
to really jump out. Not only did I now find the article to be fairly one-sided
but some of the expenses seemed outlandish and even un-necessary. Here’s some
example of some of the comments…
Jesus, I've not been on tour since 2006 (part time)...and I
could save them that "loss" in less than a day of work on the budget.
Are agents getting 15% nowadays? Did they really take lights out with
them....but no LD? Why didn't they get a TM who also does FOH?! They hired pro
musicians who don't have road cases for their s..t? Promoters don't pay for the
marketing any more? A radio ad?! That's just off the top of my head. – Hugo
Burnham
I've toured as both a musician and guitar tech, and doing
festival gigs with Iggy & The Stooges often times it was only myself, one
other roadie, and a road manager. Occasionally there would be a third roadie.
This band had far too big of a crew, and too big of a vehicle. No need to
travel with lights.
Their loss was their own fault! This article is yet another ploy to get attention. Not buying it. -Derek See
Their loss was their own fault! This article is yet another ploy to get attention. Not buying it. -Derek See
At this point a nagging
little voice started to yell in the back of my head. “This article is popping
up everywhere and getting a lot of traction. Regardless of what the article is
about…I wonder how many people have gone to YouTube or iTunes and checked out
who Pomplamoose is after reading it…is that the REAL intent of this article”
DAY 3 – The curtain gets
pull back and the ‘truth’ gets revealed…maybe. This morning, I saw this comment
about the article:
If you read the article carefully, it's a well-designed
advertisement that states that you can't make money on tour, but you make more
money on this one site Patreon than you can on iTunes and Loudr. Pomplamoose
even has a page on this one site Patreon that they provide a link to.
But Jack Conte is a cofounder of Patreon - and in fact - while he's complaining about not making money on tour - his company Patreon has raised over 17 MILLION dollars from angel investors and other investors over the past year. He doesn't disclose this in the article - because the article is facially an article "letting his fans who asked him questions about what its like to have 'made it'" know how his touring expenses are.
Meanwhile, in the article, he's selling a lifestyle of the starving artist - an artist who can make money by producing comics, coding, music and the like - all services that Patreon supplies crowdfunding for.
Pretty devious, eh?
Going back to what I was thinking on Day 2, that this article would have a ripple effect of getting people to check out the band, after reading this comment I started to see that the articles intent may have actually been the ripple effect. Looking around at the various versions of the article being shared, the only link included in most of the postings is to Patreon. Patreon is basically a crowd funding site focused on helping artists raise funds to support their work/projects, etc. I knew Jack Conte was a co-founder and even knew that a lot of what Pamplamoose has done video wise was funded through Patreon, but I had no idea to what extent the rest of it was or that they had over 17 million already raised.
But Jack Conte is a cofounder of Patreon - and in fact - while he's complaining about not making money on tour - his company Patreon has raised over 17 MILLION dollars from angel investors and other investors over the past year. He doesn't disclose this in the article - because the article is facially an article "letting his fans who asked him questions about what its like to have 'made it'" know how his touring expenses are.
Meanwhile, in the article, he's selling a lifestyle of the starving artist - an artist who can make money by producing comics, coding, music and the like - all services that Patreon supplies crowdfunding for.
Pretty devious, eh?
Going back to what I was thinking on Day 2, that this article would have a ripple effect of getting people to check out the band, after reading this comment I started to see that the articles intent may have actually been the ripple effect. Looking around at the various versions of the article being shared, the only link included in most of the postings is to Patreon. Patreon is basically a crowd funding site focused on helping artists raise funds to support their work/projects, etc. I knew Jack Conte was a co-founder and even knew that a lot of what Pamplamoose has done video wise was funded through Patreon, but I had no idea to what extent the rest of it was or that they had over 17 million already raised.
In Pomplamoose’s defense,
the comment I read on Day 3 could in itself be exaggerated, based on hearsay,
or even twisted to support the commenter’s own criticizing remarks, but let’s
consider all this with the factors in play and sum up the basics…Artist sob
story about going out on tour but losing money goes viral, in the story the
only link is to a website that gives you an opportunity to support said artist
through a cash donation…what do you think will happen? Factor in that as the
story circulates more and more around the net, ‘non-industry’ people will start
reading the article. These are people who won’t see the holes in the story or
the over exaggerated possibly inflated by high sense of entitlement expenses
listed as ‘facts’. Joe public will just see a story about a band getting
screwed over and a link to where you can provide support.
Now, don’t get me wrong, it
is a fact that it can be rather expensive for a band to go out on the road and
within the current state of the music industry, ticket sales or guarantees
don’t often cover the costs associated with touring. More artists need to take
the time to look at what the cost of tour will be and keep that in mind when
negotiating guarantees or other payment structures. Artists also need to keep
in mind that this is a business and whenever you’re starting a new business or
expanding into new markets (which touring basically is) you will see some
loses, but just like with a business if you continue to work at it and focus on
developing a customer/fan base in that market you will start to see a turn
around and start making a profit.
The unfortunate bigger issue
with this article going viral and the lack of transparency when it came to the
expenses that were reported is that it creates a system of distrust and lack of
sympathy for the perceived ‘lying’ artist. The music industry is very much like
a small town and if you’re telling a story, but holding back some key elements
that can impact how you are perceived due to the story, once those elements are
discovered that can have a completely negative impact on how you are perceived
by those who followed you. No one likes getting tricked. No one likes being
lied to. Withdrawing or simply not revealing all the information isn’t lying
but it can create an environment of dis-trust when said information is
revealed.
When people found out my
brother and cousin weren’t really arguing, there were some people who were
fairly upset. They thought my brother and cousin were really fighting, to the
point where they were genuinely concerned. When they found out it wasn’t
actually an argument, they felt cheated and lied to. Their feelings were
manipulated. For the band, Pomplamoose as more and more ‘truths’ start to
surface about this situation, one way another people may feel that their
feeling are being manipulated which could lead to the supposedly planted
article having a negative impact, if it hasn’t already.
No comments:
Post a Comment